Short answer: Package treatment sizing consists of 4 steps: (1) Determining the equivalent person (KE) (actual users + sector multiplier), (2) Average daily flow calculation (per capita or production-based water consumption × KE), (3) Maximum flow with peak factor (usually 2-4×), (4) Wastewater characteristics (determining reactor volume with KOİ, BOİ, FOG, N, P values). Incorrect sizing is the most common package system error — especially critical during seasonal/variable loads.
Package Treatment Capacities Package Treatment Capacity Ranges
Package systems cover a very wide range of capacities. Typical classification:
| Category | Flow (m³/day) | KE (equivalent person) | Typical Structure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mini package | 2-10 | 10-50 | Villa, small site, gas station |
| Small package | 10-50 | 50-250 | Pension, highway rest area, small hotel |
| Medium package | 50-200 | 250-1,000 | Hotel (50-200 rooms), site, small factory |
| Large package | 200-1,000 | 1,000-5,000 | Large hotel, shopping mall, small municipality |
| Industrial package | 1,000-2,000 | 5,000-10,000 | Single factory in organized industrial zone, medium municipality |
At capacities above 2,000 m³/day, the package system loses its economic advantage; a modular concrete facility or hybrid structure is preferred.
What is Equivalent Person (KE)?
Equivalent person (KE) defines the wastewater load produced by one person per day as a standard unit:
- Wastewater flow: 120-200 L/person·day (developed country 200, developing 120-150)
- BOİ load: 60 g/person·day (European standard)
- KOİ load: 120 g/person·day
- AKM load: 70 g/person·day
- TN load: 11 g/person·day
- TP load: 2 g/person·day
Sector-based wastewater loads are converted to KE equivalents according to these standards.
Sector-Based KE Multipliers
| Usage | KE Multiplier | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Residential (permanent) | 1 KE/person | Number of residents × 1 |
| Hotel (luxury) | 1.5-2 KE/bed | Number of beds × 1.5-2 |
| Hotel (standard) | 1-1.3 KE/bed | Number of beds × 1-1.3 |
| Apartment/pension | 0.8-1 KE/bed | Number of beds × 0.8-1 |
| Restaurant | 0.3-0.5 KE/seat | Seating capacity × 0.3-0.5 |
| Office | 0.3-0.5 KE/employee | Number of employees × 0.3-0.5 |
| Shopping mall | 0.05-0.1 KE/visitor | Daily visitors × 0.05-0.1 |
| School (daytime) | 0.3-0.4 KE/student | Number of students × 0.3-0.4 |
| Hospital | 2-4 KE/bed | Beds × 2-4 (sector-specific treatment required) |
| Construction site/camp | 0.8-1 KE/worker | Number of workers × 0.8-1 |
| Highway rest area | 0.1-0.2 KE/vehicle | Daily vehicles × 0.1-0.2 |
Practical Sizing Examples
Example 1: 80-Room 3-Star Hotel
- Number of beds: 80 × 2 = 160 beds
- KE multiplier: 1.2 (standard hotel)
- Total KE: 160 × 1.2 = 192 KE
- Staff addition: 25 × 0.5 = +12.5 KE
- Restaurant (60 seats): 60 × 0.4 = +24 KE
- Total: ~230 KE
- Average flow: 230 × 150 L/day = 35 m³/day
- Peak factor 3×: 105 m³/day design capacity
- Recommended system: 40-60 m³/day package SBR or MBBR (seasonal average), modular with an upper limit of 100 m³/day
Example 2: 200-Worker Construction Site
- Workers: 200, KE multiplier 0.9 = 180 KE
- Average flow: 180 × 120 L = 22 m³/day
- Peak factor 2.5×: 55 m³/day
- Recommended system: 25 m³/day container MBR (compact + portable)
Example 3: 500-Unit Residential Complex
- Persons: 500 × 3 (average per unit) = 1,500 persons
- KE: 1,500
- Flow: 1,500 × 150 L = 225 m³/day
- Peak 2.5×: 560 m³/day
- Recommended system: 250 m³/day MBR package (large) — Si structure + modular extension for building expansion
Example 4: Dairy Factory (Industrial)
Industrial facilities are calculated directly based on production flow instead of KE:
- Milk production: 50,000 L/day
- Wastewater multiplier: 3 L wastewater/L product = 150,000 L/day = 150 m³/day wastewater
- KOİ load: 150 m³ × 4,000 mg/L = 600 kg KOİ/day → ~5,000 KE equivalent organic load
- Recommended system: 150-200 m³/day industrial package MBR + UASB anaerobic pre-treatment (biogas)
Peak Factor — Why is it Important?
Wastewater flow is not constant throughout the day. During peak hours (hotel morning showers, factory shift changes), wastewater inflow can be 2-4 times the average flow. Ignoring the peak factor in design leads to chronic overflow + biological shock.
| Usage | Peak Factor | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 2-2.5× | Morning/evening shower intensity |
| Hotel (season) | 3-4× | Off-season 0.3× → season 4× |
| Highway rest area | 5-8× | Holidays, weekend peaks |
| Restaurant | 3-5× | Lunch and dinner service |
| Factory (fixed) | 1.5-2× | Shift changes, CIP |
| Food factory | 3-5× | Production spikes + CIP washings |
| Construction site | 2-3× | Lunch + end of shift showers |
| School | 2-3× | Recess peaks |
Reactor Volume Calculation
After determining the flow, the biological reactor volume is calculated based on wastewater characteristics and the selected process:
Activated Sludge / SBR
- HRT (hydraulic retention time): 8-24 hours
- F/M ratio: 0.2-0.4 kg BOİ/kg MLSS·day
- MLSS: 2,500-4,500 mg/L
- Typical volume: Flow (m³/day) × 0.5-1 (according to HRT)
MBBR
- HRT: 4-8 hours
- Carrier fill: 40-60%
- Specific surface activity: 5-15 g BOİ/m²·day
- Typical volume: Flow × 0.25-0.4 (compact)
MBR
- HRT: 4-8 hours (compact)
- MLSS: 8,000-12,000 mg/L (4× classical)
- Membrane flux: 15-25 L/m²·hour
- Typical volume: Flow × 0.2-0.3 (most compact)
Importance of Balancing Tank
If the peak factor is high, the biological reactor is not designed for peak flow — instead, a large balancing tank is used. This approach:
- Keeps reactor volume small (CAPEX savings)
- Allows biological process to operate at stable average flow
- Ensures pH, temperature, and composition homogenization
Typical balancing HRT: hotel/season 12-24 hours, factory CIP 8-12 hours, residential 4-6 hours.
Sizing Decision Matrix by Type
| Criterion | Classical/SBR | MBBR | MBR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limited budget | Ideal | Suitable | Expensive |
| Limited space | Standard | Compact | Most compact |
| Water recovery target | Difficult | Additional UF required | Direct |
| Shock load (season/CIP) | Medium | Very high | High |
| Sensitive receiving environment | Insufficient | Medium | Ideal |
| Limited operating personnel | SBR suitable | Very suitable | Membrane knowledge required |
8 Questions for Investment Decision
- What is the source of your wastewater? Is it solely domestic, or is there an industrial composition?
- What is the number of users or production volume? A key input for KE calculation.
- Is there seasonality? If it is a hotel/tourist facility, a balancing tank is critical.
- What are your discharge limits? Which sector does the SKKY table refer to, is it a sensitive receiving environment?
- What is your water recovery target? If there is one, MBR is mandatory.
- What is the available area? If narrow, MBR; if wide, SBR/MBBR.
- What is the qualification of the operating personnel? If there is no membrane knowledge, MBBR is safer.
- What is the potential for expansion? If there is a possibility of increasing capacity later, modular design.
Common Sizing Errors
- "There are this many rooms, per person X liters" estimation: Peak factor and wastewater composition are ignored. Result: chronic problem.
- Not accounting for seasonal decreases: When a hotel operates at 20% capacity in winter, the biological process dies from starvation. Recycle is needed for low loads.
- Calculating industrial wastewater like domestic: Dairy factory wastewater is 5-10× domestic in kg KOİ. KE multiplier becomes 5-10.
- Sizing without characterization: Reactor volume cannot be estimated without knowing KOİ, BOİ, FOG, N, P.
- "Size 50% larger for backup" strategy: Excess capacity leads to biological degradation at low loads. Modular design is smarter.
Professional Sizing Process
- Wastewater characterization — 1-3 months sample analysis (if there is an existing facility)
- Extracting usage profile — hourly flow estimation, seasonality
- KE and flow calculation — along with peak factor
- Wastewater load calculation — total loadings of KOİ, BOİ, FOG, N, P
- Process selection — SBR/MBBR/MBR decision matrix
- Reactor sizing — according to HRT, F/M, MLSS, flow parameters
- Auxiliary equipment sizing — blower, pump, sensor
- Expansion strategy — modular or capacity upper limit
Conclusion
The success of selecting a package treatment system depends 80% on correct sizing. Estimates made without KE calculation, sector multipliers, peak factor, and wastewater characterization lead to chronic operational problems. Requesting professional wastewater characterization + sizing studies before the investment decision is the most economical approach in the long term.
Related guides: How Package Treatment Works, MBR vs MBBR, SBR vs MBR vs Conventional, MBR Investment Analysis. You can request a professional sizing study for your facility.
Atıksu arıtma uzmanı, çevre mühendisi. Endüstriyel su arıtma projelerinde 20+ yıl saha deneyimi.